Freedom Struggle & Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

Posted: February 28, 2006 in Arbit Thoughts, Gibberish Blabber

“I am just writing this post to wonder if anyone else is struck by the sheer irony of the fact that Bhagat Singh and co, when they did not get the facilities in prison they had a right to, went on a hunger strike. They did not attack the prison guards. They did not hatch a conspiracy to murder the jailor. They did not even plot a takeover of the prison. They went on a hunger strike”
                                                                – Gaurav Sabnis writes here

The fast being referred to is a 64 day long fast. The longest in human history. They refused all forms of forced feeding. Taking the numerous tortures in their stride. In any war, strength is not only about raining blows, but also about taking thm and yet not relenting. Gandhi of course was treated as a ‘political prisoner’, and was served his daily quota of newspapers and juice first thing in the morning.

The people being reffered to are 23 year old boys, who took the initiative of waking a dormant sleeping nation even at the cost of their lives. They did not run away or make any attempts to that end, faced arrest just to spread the message to the other people in the country.

As much as I reserve my respects for Gaurav, especially after that IIPM episode, in this I staunchly beg to differ. The act was more non violent than ‘Saunders’ murder’ only this once they chose to direct the violence at themselves. The actors remained the same, only the roles got reversed. The prison guards, jailors were Individuals doing their duties in a corroded system. The fight was against the ‘system’ and not its individual entities, so taking british lives or the lives of indian policement would have served no purpose. Saunders murder was an abberation, more like the reaction of an action (Jallianwalla Bagh).
Comming to the second point of his post, I think Gandhi was an Unscrupulous man who did a lot of good for his country. I believe that the ‘Dirty politics’ found its birth in the khadi of Gandhi. So while his ideas of non-violence may have been appropriate , relevant or even sacrosanct in the circumstances (we will do good to understand at this point that the millions of people of India never did have the same level of tenacity or power of charactersthat individuals like Bhagat or Bismil showed. They might not have been able to do justice to the demands of a revolutionary); he definitely was no Saint.

I would agree with Bal Thakerey in his comments that he does not deserve the title of “Father of the Nation” for a country with over 5000 years of documented history. I would much rather give him the title of the “Master of India’s freedom Struggle
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, a person who had the most profound influence over INDIA. Father of modern Indian politics. ‘Kautilya’ of India’s freedom struggle.The ready to eat stories from my history books, during my schooling, always told me that there was no better man who ever walked in this country. He was the nearest to the incarnation of GOD. A saint by all means!
When I finally got interested and motivated enough to do some digging for myself I got some rather startling results. Initially it created a nefarious image of this powerful personality, but as I kept on reading the haze started to clear up. At the end of the whole exercise, the outcome was enriching in a sense that, now I admired Gandhi for what he was, rather than what he is madeout to be. And yes he was definitely no saint! Let me start on the elaboration in a narrational way.

Being brought up in Delhi, you would inevitably believe that “Gandhi”s were the sole cause of all good that has ever come upon our country. Starting from the airport (Indira gandhi International Airport), to important crossings (Rajiv Gandhi Chowk a.k.a Connaught Place a.k.a CP) to IGNOU to JNU. Taking a cue from the movie Matrix somewhere, it all seemed too perfect to be true. For now, I would only dwell upon M.K.Gandhi and leave the rest for some later time.

Most history books including the one followed by CBSE i.e NCERT book almost solely attributed the freedom movement to Gandhi and his followers. A one liner in a shared one paragraph mention was all the others like Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev, Rajguru, Subhash Chandra Bose, Rajendra Lahiri, and the likes got. But over a period of time my perception started to change, My frequent debates with my history teaching mother, my favourite serial on TV : Swaraj and readups about these ‘lesser mortals’ in reliable and neutral journals, started to have its effect. Lets check out some facts about this whole story, and on it do a case-by-case evaluation.
Quoting history from Wikipedia about Subhash Chandra Bose:
“He became the president of the Haripura Indian National Congress in 1938, against Gandhi’s wishes. He was elected for a second term in 1939 in Tripuri Congress Session; Gandhi had supported Pattabhi Sitaramayya and commented “Pattabhi’s defeat is my defeat” after learning the election results. Although Bose won the election, Gandhi’s continued opposition led to the latter’s resignation from the Working Committee. In the face of this gesture of no-confidence, Bose himself resigned”

Here was a time when the ‘Mahatma’ commited homicide of democracy as we know it. Gandhi saw in Bose an alternative leadership source and wanted to eliminate him so that the center of power would not get compromised. It may not have been in his self interest, as he might have believed that the freedom struggle is better directed by one director. I have had the fortune of interacting with freedom fighters, who vividly recollect how Gandhi, Nehru and Co. would be enjoying fruit juice while in the chamer next to them the revolutionaries were being inhumanly tortured, and the whole prison was shaking with their screams in agony. While objectively its nothing wrong to enjoy your food, the circumstancial evidence indicates in the contempt Gandhi had for them. Contrasting it with Subhash, who when confronted by a reporter after resigning as Congress President said that his difference with ‘Bapu’ was only intheir views; He had the utmost respect for him as a person. I think the level of both these individuals should be gaugable by their reactions. Gandhi was unsporting, to be not able to accept defeat in public’s eyes. Subhash was above such petty matters of EGO.
Gandhi, reportedly retorted to his political manouvering even in matters like life of revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh. It is said that while he did make a passing mention about granting amnesty to the ‘miguided youth’ to the Viceroy, he did not utilize the powerful negotiating position he was in to secure their release. His negotiating position was by the virtue of the fact that the ‘Gandhi-Irwin’ pact was at stake and Lord Irwin was desperate to show the crown that he had been able to reach a setllemement. Quoting from Wikipedia:
“The government, represented by Lord Irwin, decided to negotiate with Gandhi. The Gandhi-Irwin Pact was signed in March 1931. In it, the British Government agreed to set all political prisoners free in return for the suspension of the civil disobedience movement.
The fact that Bhagat and Co. were political prisoners and not dacoits or petty thieves, is self evident and hence does not need much supporting evidence. So essentially Gandhi was to negotiate for a deal which would only have been Fair. But Alas!

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, a man with his own personal favourites. A Man who found in Nehru an inseperable aid and a dear friend. The antics of Nehru and  la’affaire with Mrs. Mountbatten are well known. Quoting history from Wikipedia :
” It is said that Lady Mountbatten enjoyed the sexual company of intelligent non-British men…It is reliably assumed that she had an ongoing affair with Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, which continued until her death, her daughters having confirmed this…Lady Mountbatten’s relationship with Nehru is determinatively documented. In both their cases, their extraordinarily public service has ensured that no scandal has arisen”
Thanks to ‘bapu’ Nehru rather than a much more competent Sardar Patel became the Prime Minister of independent Inidia.
But justice be done, Gandhi was a patriot by any means. Evident from his protests against the “Two Nation Theory“. Quoting Wikipedia again:
“Congress leaders knew that Gandhi would viscerally oppose partition, and it was impossible for the Congress to go ahead without his agreement, for Gandhi’s support in the party and throughout India was strong. Gandhi’s closest colleagues had accepted partition as the best way out, and Sardar Patel endeavoured to convince Gandhi that it was the only way to avoid civil war. A devastated Gandhi gave his assent. On the day of the transfer of power, Gandhi did not celebrate independence with the rest of India, but was alone in Calcutta, mourning the partition and working to end the violence. After India’s independence, Gandhi focused on Hindu-Muslim peace and unity”

So Concluding, While Gandhi may have been effecient and effective as a mass leader and a proponent of pro-freedom sentiments in the till then left aside masses, he had a complicated character and had his own share of grey areas to say the least. The contribution he made to the freedom struggle was commendable, but a trivial comparison with revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, Netaji or others is absurd and bizzare. They did not sacrifice their lives and their deaths with an intent to compete with Gandhi, They did that for their country, and by any scale their contributions were no less. Afterall  life is not measured by its length but by the substance that it packs in.

Links to read more about other controversies surrounding Gandhi

Advertisements
Comments
  1. shailesh chandel says:

    Certainly there are many sharing your thought. Challenge is to get them out of the rut in which they have been living all there life. We are not born as an Indian only we are born as childeren of the country which has designated Mahatma Gandhi as the father of Nation. I do beleive he did a great contribution to Indias freedom fight but in no ways he was in comparision to lesser knows leaders like Subhash and Bhagat Singh.

  2. Alok says:

    Ya. I too believe that Gandhi had contributed in the freedom of our beloved India, but Bhagat Singh Jee, Subhash Chandra Bose and others should not be compared wth him. They did what is required at that time. They are in a much higher position than Gandhi. They did what Gandhi could not ve thought of doing. He always enjoyed a comfortable life even in jails.

  3. Cheetos says:

    Gandhi was a lot of things, one amon which was the father of ppolitics in contemporary India. his service was much like that, a service. Bhagat, Bose, Azad and others however took to their country as ‘Upasana’ (Worship) true to the meaning of the word Vandana from Vande Maataram. Theirs was a sacrimonious service, self effacing and regardless ofall the tortures that their mind, body and souls would take. This in itself made it of a way higher league than any politicians (Gandhi, Nehru.. et al) contribution.
    Even comparing these martyrs with the likes of Gandhi is an insult to their Upasana, to their worship for theri beloved motherland.

    ‘Dhana Dhanya pushpon se bhara, humaari yeh vasundhara,
    usi ke beech basa hua hai sabhi deshon ka sartaj,
    jo sapno se gathan kiya gaya ho aur smitiyon se hai juda,
    aisa desh nahin milega purey jahan main duja,
    yeh hai sab deshon ka rani jo yeh, hai meri janmabhoomi,
    yeh hai meri janmabhoomi, Yeh hai meri Janmabhoomi”

    (Adapted from an old bengali patriotic song)

  4. tanmay says:

    well I agree that Gandhi had a big contribution in freedom struggle but ,not so much that all credit is given to him . After freedom all the history was written by the congress lead govt. and that’s why we the youth are still not able to appreciate and acknowledge the contributions of the likes of Khudiram Bose Madanlal Dhingra and others. So I must really thank you guys to bring some rare facts to light and would like all of us to share the informations with others.

  5. abeer says:

    babu is the only one and he was the first man who was to say the truth he stuggleed alot i wnat to see bamu and say thank you Allah thank you for babu and thank you babu. for giveing us freedom

  6. abeer says:

    So I must really thank you guys to bring some rare facts to light and would like all of us to share the informations with others.

  7. rajasak says:

    please can u sent the who is invalved in the freedom struggle
    in india.

    list out the names of them.

  8. well i am an afghan living in afghanistan i have just startd knowing about Gandhi, so far i have learned about him he was the best personality and a great Political Guru to others, i just want to say that nither India nor other countries will have another Gandhi, we have to keep him in our heart he was a great Human being,,,

    Baseer Farahi
    baseerfarahi_4u@yahoo.com

  9. Cheetos says:

    To all : My Apologies for this really late reply. Belive me MBA realy kept me on my toes. Anyways, as someone said better late than never, so here goes…

    @ Tanmay: Like minds think alike 🙂 Although, there might be aspects in the story (the larger picture) that we MIGHT be missing out. Thanks for writing in.

    @ Abeer: We may differ in our opinions and yet its imperative that we listen to each others reason. Thanks for writing in

    @ RajaSK: Let us assume that I don’t recognize or don’t know of anyone by the name of Amitabh Bachan. Does it make him any less of what he actually is. The fact that people know/don’t know about some/all facts about incidents/people does not in any way alter the reality. I could answer your question directly but then that would absolve you of doing your homework. IF YOU CARE TO KNOW THE TRUTH then Spend some time reading in net/library about the freedom struggle. knowledge is the light that removes the darkness of mass hypnotic ignorance

    @ Baseer : A very balanced opinion, I must admit. Though my opinions do differ. Nice to have someone from afghanistan write in. Do keep visiting

  10. darenhoff says:

    In a nutshell
    Gandhi gave birth to dirty politics
    He threw out Netaji because he new that Netaji is there then no ‘gandhi’ will ever be popular in Indian politics
    And we are still victim of his dirty politics even today

    I WONDER HOW A MAN WHO CAN NOT RESPECT HIS RELIGION OF BIRTH AND CHANGES IT TIMES AND AGAIN CAN BE CALLED “FATHER OF NATION” – IT A SHAME FOR THIS COUNTRY.

  11. seer says:

    There was a time when I thought that our people dont recognize the significance because the freedom struggle was fought through ahimsa and tolerance. But I’m now seeing that ahimsa is the most human way of showing opposition. If we look things with an openmind and not emotionally, we will always get a better understanding about everything.

    India is the most complex nation, every piece of it differs in race, culture and practices. Honestly, if the freedom struggle were fought through arms and war, there wouldn’t have been one India, we would have been split into many countries. considering even with ahimsa, we could not prevent the split of pakistan.

    Before judging our freedom movement, we must understand the nature of our people, we are more emotional than rational. Yes, truth might be bitter but only if we accept truth we can better ourselves.

    If violence was the method of freedom struggle, we would have fought the british, then we would have fought among ourselves, might I remind you that India was still a collection of princely states at the time of freedom. I hope I dont have to remind you about the Dravida nadu, khalistan movements and the current separatist activities in the northeast. Ahimsa and tolerance is the only reason we are still in one piece. and I’m really hurt to hear such comments about the father of our nation. Mahatma Gandhi’s ahimsa and philosophy are futuristic and is the best medicine for this divided country and world.

    I would also like to remind you that defaming Mahatma is one way to kill the spirit of our nation. If we dont feel good about yourselves then we will be down in spirits and action. If our freedom movement is defamed, it is going to destabalise our nation. I hope you know that there are a large number of people and countries that would like to see an un-peaceful, India.

    And I would also like to write about Bhagat singh. Since I used to hold him higher than Gandhi before I embraced Ahimsa. Now, I hold them both on par. Noone can lessen the sacrifice and spirit of bhagat singh, there have been times when the mention of his name has brought me shivers. Shivers that you would feel when you sing the national anthem.
    But defaming Gandhi to support Bhagat singh is unfair to both of them.

    Dying in a fight for freedom is great but living to continue the fight is greater.

    Every nation needs a face and a father and Mahatma gandhi is the only person who can meet this challenge for India.
    ………..This comment is getting lengthy, I think i would write a post about this in my blog.

    thank you for sharing your views and I hope that you look favourably into my views.
    -Seer.

    ps.I dont know why you quoted Bal Thakerey, personally I think he’s one of the worst things that has happened to India.

  12. darenhoff says:

    Seer,
    respect your post. Tell me where is the value of democracy and freedom in India at present? Only the politicians are enjoying tax payers money, they all are opening $accounts in swiss bank and many of them does not know the spelling of $!!!!
    Who voted this “Gandhis”? How the “gandhis” came into power ?

    Only because of that man. He in no way can be called “the father of the nation”.

  13. fluid identity says:

    to support what you say, Nathuram Godse’s speech could be added in.

  14. Hey !… good post. I post on this blog because you possibly can to help me. I know, it’s not the exactly exactly area to publish but … I want to have a extremely free hosting company that is ok to accept Javascript and Ajax. Do you know a great host or better a first-class free hosters database or something like that… … for what I want ? one more thing: Have you links to give me for free without ads hosting ?? How have you built your blog ? See you

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s